Monday, September 30, 2013

Great social skills post


Subject: Article from Readers Digest Departments 2013 10 01
Uncommon Sense By Jeanne Marie Laskas Modern Ways to Mind Your Manners Our resident voice of reasons says ... If someone sits right next to me in an empty movie theater, is it offensive to move? Maybe, but nobody will fault you for it. Chances are the close sitter has trouble reading social cues, so he might even miss your irritation. You undoubtedly aren't the first person he's met who needs some elbowroom. Forgive his bad judgment, move quietly, and enjoy the show. If someone has food stuck in his teeth, do I tell him? Total Golden Rule moment: Do unto others. Would you want this person to tell you? There's your answer. If I use the bathroom at Starbucks, do I need to buy something? Consider frequency and urgency. Is this a one-time thing or an emergency? If so, you don't have to buy anything, but it would be kind if you did. However, if you regularly relieve yourself at this location, then you are a customer, and you should act like one. If I'm shopping and decide I don't want to buy something after all, is it wrong to hang it on the nearest rack? Yes! Clean up after yourself. Your laziness means someone else has to pick up after you. If I open a door for someone and more people approach, do I stand there like a doorman? Stand there like a courteous person who's willing to help. Smile and make eye contact with everyone who passes. One of them should take over for you to return the favor. If I'm with my child and someone nearby is swearing loudly, should I ask him to stop? It's very risky to tell poorly mannered people how to behave. They usually take offense and get worse. Instead, turn to your child with a smile and say softly, "Well, that was rude, wasn't it? If my friends choose a restaurant I can't afford, is it uncool to decline? You can nix the place but still accept the invitation. Say "Oh, I would love to, but that restaurant is beyond my budget. Wanna try [insert name of cheaper place] instead? They'll get it. It's about the friendship, not the food and not the money. If my pal keeps using the same phrase incorrectly (it's "intents and purposes," not "intensive purposes"), can I correct her? Please? Of course! We the Grammar Police invite you to enlist. Understand that you will be perceived as a profound annoyance by many people. So own it! I would now like to obnoxiously correct your word usage. Bonus points for any outreach involving dangling modifiers. If I remember my friend's birthday a day late, should I apologize or just wish her a happy birthday like nothing happened? This is the reason the word belated was invented. Happy belated birthday! is shorthand for: "Yeah, I know I forgot, but then I remembered, so cut me some slack, and it's kinda funny, and you've done it before, too, so, hey, happy birthday. If I didn't get a plus-one to a wedding, is it impolite to ask for one? Yes. If the happy couple wanted you to bring a date, they would have said "and guest. They did not. So don't put them in the awkward position of having to explain themselves. It's their day, not yours. Is it OK to taste a grape in the market before I buy a bunch? No. No one wants to buy food that someone else has been picking at. Can I lie about seeing a text because I was too busy or lazy to respond to it? It's a small wrong that means you're a big wimp. Don't lie. Receiving a text does not mean you need to read it, respond to it, or care about what it says. Why waste a perfectly good lie when the truth will serve? Yes," you can say if ever asked, "I saw it. No explanation needed as to why you didn't text back. If I don't agree with something in a link or story that a friend posted on my Facebook wall, is it inappropriate to delete it? Remove what you don't like. Think of it as the front yard of your house: If someone stuck a sign there with a slogan you found offensive, would you leave it? Your wall is the same: your space, your choice. 

Sunday, September 29, 2013

Fake service dogs! This really has made the news


Subject: Article from Matilda Ziegler Feature Writer 2013 09 23
Ann Chiapetta's Dog Guide Extraordinaire Verona - Dogs in the News Are fake service dogs spoiling it for us? I don't know if any of my other canine colleagues are worried about this, but I sure am. I mean, I know my job and I love to do my best for my human partner, Annie. What I'm upset about are the fakers. Yes, you know who I am talking about. They are the dogs who look like us, but don't let them fool you. Let's just say that even though we're all cousins, they haven't made it past elementary school. Service dogs like me have graduated from college. Let me give you an example. One day I was taking Annie to lunch. As we came back from the deli, we passed a vitamin store and this little white thing came running up and he tried to bite me. Well, it sure scared me but I was not going to let him get me or Annie. We stood there, he kept snapping, and I avoided his little teeth. Well, the owner of the store ran out, tried grabbing him and he ran away from her and tried to bite my hind legs. I turned around, Annie following me. Finally the lady got the dog and we left. He is supposed to be a service dog. That, readers, is not how a real service dog behaves. There is more about this concern of people taking fake service dogs into public and how it will make it bad for us in the following article posted on Pawnation:http://www.pawnation.com/2013/09/20/this-falls-hottest-accessory-fake-service-dogs/ The article states, in part, "A growing number of dog owners are trying to pass their untrained companions off as service animals - and they're actually getting away with it. It's not hard to do because service dog gear sold on the internet, like vests, harnesses, and I.D. tags can be purchased without proving the dog is a legitimately trained and certified service dog. The backlash of the public becoming less and less tolerant of service dog teams is what concerns dog guides and dogs trained to help our partners with disabilities. It's already hard enough to be accepted in the public and due to misbehaved frauds like that little dog who tried to hurt us, people will be confused and even less willing to receive us in public places. My partner Annie says it's the bad apples spoiling it for all the good ones. Not sure I get that, but, hey, she's only human. If you have any thoughts on this article, comment in the Reader's Forum

Saturday, September 28, 2013

Advanced class

Hi!
Just wanted to let everyone  know we had a great time with the advanced class today! We downloaded and critiqued apps and analyzed the new operating system. Sam and Tim we missed your expertise. We had a great meal at Black Angus to wrap up our day. Thank you John and Dina!

OIB picnic will be held October 12 at the Center. The time will be 11-3. If you are musical, plan to participate. We are going to showcase our OIB talent and enjoy great food. Please register with Krystal for our food count.

iPad training for beginners will be held again on October 19.

Friday, September 27, 2013

Sad news for French fry lovers


 Hold the fries, pass the salad. McDonald's Corp on Thursday said it would offer healthy options as part of its popular value meals, letting customers choose a side salad, fruit or vegetables instead of french fries. The announcement by the world's largest fast-food chain comes as more companies respond to government and consumer pressure to address the global obesity epidemic. McDonald's, which often bears the brunt of criticism over the restaurant industry's penchant for tempting diners with indulgent and often high-calorie food, said it would offer the option in all of its 20 major global markets by 2020. McDonald's also vowed to promote and market only water, milk and juice as the beverages in its popular Happy Meals for children as part of its announcement at the Clinton Global Initiative annual meeting in New York on Thursday. Waist sizes around the world are increasing, setting off alarms in public health circles. In recent years, the U.S. food industry has begun yielding to pressure from government, parents and consumers seeking to slim down adults and children. Sugary sodas have been yanked from public schools; sugar, sodium and calorie levels have been reduced in products, and calorie counts have been posted on some restaurant menus. The Center for Science in the Public Interest, a nonprofit that has tangled with McDonald's over everything from fattening food to the marketing of Happy Meals, approved of the company's move to add more fruits and vegetables to the menu. Still, it says the company and its rivals have a long way to go in terms of offering healthier options. McDonald's slow march toward healthier meals made a major advance today, but a long road lies ahead for the company," CSPI said in a statement. McDonald's is seen as something of a trend setter among restaurant chains, but like many of its peers, it has tended to resist external efforts to force change. About one year ago McDonald's said it would begin listing calorie information on menus in some 14,000 U.S. restaurants and drive-throughs -- ahead of a national rule that would require larger restaurant chains to make such disclosures but months after other chains embraced the idea. In July 2011 it tweaked its popular Happy Meals for children - reducing the french fries portion by more than half and adding apples to every order. The move came after pressure from CSPI, parent groups and others. More than one-third of Americans are obese, and about 10 percent of the nation's healthcare bill is tied to obesity-related illnesses, such as Type 2 diabetes, heart disease and hypertension, according to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. McDonald's said its announcement is part of a plan developed with the Alliance for a Healthier Generation, which was founded by the Clinton Foundation and American Heart Association, to increase customers' access to fruit and vegetables and help families and children to make informed eating and lifestyle choices

Happy Friday!

Friends, I did it again! Lost a whole day this week! Looked at the blog and realized I haven't posted enough. Bless Johnye, she is so good to send wonderful articles and I still can't get it together! I will try harder. Looking forward to seeing my advanced group at the Center tomorrow!
Enjoy the fall weather
Dr. Janet

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Computers for the Blind info-- please share


Subject: [Visionpsi] Computers for the Blind

Dear Colleagues,

It is my pleasure to introduce you to Computers for the Blind (CFTB). 

Who we are:
Computers for the Blind (CFTB) is a non-profit 501(c) 3 volunteer organization located in Richardson, TX.

What we do:
We provide accessible computers to persons who are blind and visually impaired so that they can have:
-The independent ability to conduct activities of daily living such as personal reading, management of finances, and maintenance of household records.
-Personal and private communications with friends, family, health care professionals and business associates.
-A virtual learning environment where information resources are just a finger-tip away.
-Improved employment opportunities through the development of knowledge, skills, and marketable abilities.
How we do it:
We collect donated laptop and desktop computers from businesses and individuals. Skilled volunteer computer technicians wipe them clean and install screen reader software (NVDA). Upon request we provide larger monitors and/or a trial version of Zoomtext. The full version is available for $200. E-mail and word processor software are part of the software library along with simple accessible tutorials on how to operate the accessible software. We currently ship about 70 computers a month throughout the country and have already shipped over 6,000 computers. We ship a minimum Dual Core 1.8 GHz, with1.5 GB memory and 80 GB hard drive. Occasionally we are able to ship Pentium 4 3.0 GHz systems.    

Who can get a computer:
Anyone with a visual impairment who is serious about using it and is willing to commit to the learning process. The cost to the consumer is $100 for a desktop, $150 for a laptop. They make perfect Christmas or birthday presents from family and friends.

These computers are ideal for persons who want/need a computer but the purchase of one through a state vocational rehabilitation agency is currently not available. We  can we partner together to meet the needs of your consumers/clients.  Please consider referring us to someone who could benefit from one.

For general inquires or to request a computer contact us at:
Computers for the Blind

Please share with others in your networks.

Respectfully,

David Jeppson, COMS, M.Ed
Executive Director
Computers for the Blind
djeppson@computersfortheblind.net

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Interesting article about marriage and cancer survivors


TUESDAY, Sept. 24 (HealthDay News) -- Married cancer patients are less likely to die of their disease than those who aren't wed, a new study suggests.
The study, of more than 730,000 people who were diagnosed with any one of 10 different cancers between 2004 and 2008, is one of the largest ever to look at the link between marital status and health.
Researchers found a strong tie between tying the knot and clearing cancer.
Married people in the study were 20 percent less likely than people who were single, widowed or divorced to die of the disease. They were also more likely to catch their cancer at an early stage and to get appropriate treatment for their disease.
"We were really surprised by the results, how profound a difference it was," said study author Dr. Ayal Aizer, chief resident of Harvard University's radiation oncology program, in Boston.
In some cases, the benefit associated with marriage was bigger than the benefit seen from medical treatment.
"For half of the cancers we looked at, the benefit of marriage was greater than the benefit conferred by chemotherapy in terms of improving survival," Aizer said.
The benefits of marriage appeared to be more pronounced for men than women. Married men were 23 percent less likely than bachelors to die of cancer, while married women were around 16 percent more likely than single women to beat the disease.
The reason? Probably prodding by the partner. Men, even physicians, are reluctant to get exams when symptoms surface.
"In my own personal relationship, my wife has been a key driver of getting me to the doctor on a regular basis," Aizer admitted.
But the study, which was published online Sept. 23 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, doesn't prove that marriage vows are the sole reason that some people beat cancer while others do not. The study only uncovered an association between marriage and better results, not cause-and-effect.
And researchers weren't able to look at whether the quality of a person's marriage played a role in how they battled back cancer.
Other studies that have taken marital quality into account have found that unhappy marriages are also unhealthy ones, said Leslie Schover, a clinical psychologist at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, in Houston.
"It isn't quite as cut-and-dried as they make it sound," said Schover, who wasn't involved in the research.
"I think it's reasonable to say that for many people, being married is something that helps them take care of their health," she added.
Other experts agree, saying it's more likely that marriage is a stand-in measure for the kind of crucial support people can receive from close personal relationships.
"It can make a huge difference if someone is there for you during stressful periods like chemotherapy or radiation treatments," said Janice Kiecolt-Glaser, a professor of psychology and psychiatry at Ohio State University who studies the impact of marriage on health.
"The success of those treatments is dependent in part on successful completion, and support makes people more likely to adhere to medical advice and finish the treatment as they should," Kiecolt-Glaser said.